Tag Archives: rachelhappe

opting in and project-based work

Image by Pathfinder Linden

Image by Pathfinder Linden

I think we are moving to an opt-in world where employees opt-in to projects, leaders opt-in and emerge into their roles.

-Rachel Happe, The Social Organization

Rachel Happe’s recent post about the future of hiring, management, and leadership presents an intriguing model for organizations.  She wrote even more thoroughly about her hopes/predictions back in December.

Essentially, she’s talking about using the model long established by consultants, who are assembled as a team on a per project basis, based on their precise suitability to and passion for the type of project under consideration.  In between jobs, they are “on the beach.”

The difference is, employees are hired by the corporation, and stay within the corporation both during and between “assignments.”  This isn’t a model of mass outsourcing and freelancing — far from it. It’s a radical way of looking at human resources, and project management.

Those that always get snapped up for projects should be rewarded while those that are regularly returned to the pool get put on development plans.  This is more or less the way consulting firms work…why not other types of corporations? (more)

What I like about it is it creates an ongoing marketplace for each worker’s skills within the corporation, and gives each worker a renewable and sustainable incentive to take ownership of their own development, to network across silos, to market themselves to their peers, and to more heavily invest in the results and process of their group work.

How would this change group project work? What would be the unintended consequences, for the organization and the worker?  Would it pan out the way Rachel (and I) think it might?  What do you think?

say it loud

We can’t promise you good things will happen when you put yourself out there. But we can guarantee that nothing will happen if you do nothing.”
Oren Sherman, Artist and Marketing Consultant

Beth Kanter asks:

What is your feeling about the value of comments to blogging?”

I responded in her comments, and felt moved to expand on the theme here, on my own time and bandwidth.

The short answer is yes, of course bloggers should keep comments open. It’s what makes a blog a blog. Sure, other distinguishing features include reverse chronological posting, and a combination of text, links, and other media. But comments are what qualifies blogs as social media. Comments distinguish blogs from other websites.

Certainly, there are excellent blogs that don’t, or rarely, open up comments. This seems mostly to be a matter of scale; some blog writers with very large readerships don’t want to respond to, deal with, or lend bandwidth to hundreds of comments on every post.

But this is hardly a concern for bloggers who are just starting out — their problem is often too few readers, not too many. Instead, it’s usually the fear of negative comments that impels novice bloggers to keep comments closed.

This fear is multiplied when it’s a CEO or Executive Director blog, or a corporate blog at any level that faces the public.

What you don’t know until you try is that:

  1. Most comments are supportive, especially when you are just starting out;
  2. Supportive comments are excellent motivation to keep writing;
  3. Motivation to keep writing cools rapidly without that positive feedback.

Without comments, it’s hard not to feel like nobody is listening. It’s also nearly impossible to know what’s working, and what’s not.

Rachel Happe wrote a very clear and useful post today about how to assess if your company is ready for social media. She encourages organizations to ask themselves what their internal “political” climate is regarding social media (how do most people in the organization view blogs? social networks? forums?); what resources do they have available for social media (staff time, money, and planning tools); and process (what is the process for responding to feedback? how will feedback be processed, internalized, and used?), among other highly relevant questions.

If a new blogger isn’t ready to open up comments, for whatever reason, it may be that they are simply not ready to blog. There’s nothing wrong with that.

And if they do want to test the waters, and just try getting into the rhythm of writing every day without the added element of comments, then they should be able to do that, too.

I don’t think it’s particularly useful to take a purist stand on this issue. What’s right for one person won’t be right for another. What’s scary to a person one day might very soon become less frightening as time goes on. Fortunately, it’s a very big internet out there. There’s room for lots of different variations on the theme.